πŸ›οΈ AI Governance Simulator

← Back to Main
εΌ˜η›ŠδΊΊι–“ (Benefit All Humanity) - Responsible AI for All
πŸ“‹ Policy Builder
⚠️ Risk Registry
βœ“ Compliance Dashboard
πŸ‘₯ Stakeholder Mapper
πŸ“Š Maturity Assessment

AI Policy Builder

Policy Information

Policy Principles

AI Risk Registry

Add New Risk

Risk Statistics

Total Risks: 6

High Risk: 2

Medium Risk: 3

Low Risk: 1

67% Mitigated

Current Risks

Algorithmic Bias in Hiring AI

High Risk Bias & Fairness

AI model may perpetuate historical biases in candidate selection, leading to discrimination.

Mitigation: Implement bias testing, diverse training data, regular audits, and human oversight.

Data Privacy Compliance Gap

Medium Risk Privacy & Security

Current data handling practices may not fully comply with GDPR requirements.

Mitigation: Conduct privacy impact assessment, implement data minimization, obtain explicit consent.

Model Drift & Performance Degradation

Medium Risk Safety & Reliability

AI model accuracy may degrade over time due to changing data patterns.

Mitigation: Implement continuous monitoring, automated alerting, and regular retraining schedules.

Lack of Model Explainability

High Risk Compliance & Legal

Black-box models cannot provide explanations for decisions, violating regulatory requirements.

Mitigation: Implement SHAP/LIME explanations, model documentation, and decision audit trails.

Third-Party AI Vendor Risks

Medium Risk Compliance & Legal

External AI services may not meet internal governance standards.

Mitigation: Vendor assessment framework, contractual requirements, regular audits.

Documentation Gaps

Low Risk Compliance & Legal

Some AI systems lack complete documentation of development process.

Mitigation: Implement documentation templates and mandatory review checkpoints.

Compliance Dashboard

GDPR Compliance

Compliant
95%

Last audit: 2025-11-15

EU AI Act

Partial
72%

Last audit: 2025-12-01

SOC 2 Type II

Compliant
88%

Last audit: 2025-10-20

ISO 27001

Compliant
92%

Last audit: 2025-11-30

NIST AI Framework

Partial
68%

Last audit: 2025-12-10

Industry Standards

Compliant
85%

Last audit: 2025-11-25

Compliance Requirements

Requirement Standard Status Due Date Owner
Data Processing Impact Assessment GDPR Art. 35 Complete 2025-12-31 Privacy Team
AI System Risk Classification EU AI Act In Progress 2026-01-15 AI Governance
Model Bias Testing NIST AI RMF Complete Quarterly ML Engineering
Security Controls Audit SOC 2 Complete 2025-12-20 Security Team
Transparency Documentation EU AI Act In Progress 2026-02-01 Product Team
Human Oversight Procedures EU AI Act Pending 2026-01-30 Operations

Compliance Actions

Stakeholder Mapper

Add Stakeholder

Stakeholder Analysis

Use the power/interest matrix to prioritize stakeholder engagement.

High Power, High Interest: Manage Closely

High Power, Low Interest: Keep Satisfied

Low Power, High Interest: Keep Informed

Low Power, Low Interest: Monitor

Power-Interest Matrix

Manage Closely

High Power, High Interest

Chief AI Officer

Strategic direction, budget approval, governance oversight

AI Ethics Board

Policy approval, risk review, ethical guidance

Keep Satisfied

High Power, Low Interest

Board of Directors

High-level oversight, major decisions, risk awareness

Legal Department

Contract review, compliance verification, liability

Keep Informed

Low Power, High Interest

Data Science Teams

Model development, testing, documentation

End Users

User experience, feedback, concerns

Monitor

Low Power, Low Interest

External Vendors

Service delivery, SLA compliance

Industry Observers

Market trends, best practices

AI Governance Maturity Assessment

Level 1

Initial

Ad-hoc processes

Level 2

Developing

Some policies defined

Level 3

Defined

Documented processes

Level 4

Managed

Measured & controlled

Level 5

Optimizing

Continuous improvement

Assessment Dimensions

Strategy & Leadership

Level 3 - 75%
  • βœ“ AI strategy documented
  • βœ“ Executive sponsorship
  • β—‹ Board-level oversight needed

Policies & Procedures

Level 4 - 80%
  • βœ“ Comprehensive policy framework
  • βœ“ Regular reviews
  • βœ“ Stakeholder input

Risk Management

Level 3 - 70%
  • βœ“ Risk registry maintained
  • βœ“ Assessment processes
  • β—‹ Automated monitoring needed

Ethics & Values

Level 3 - 65%
  • βœ“ Ethics principles defined
  • β—‹ Ethics board needed
  • β—‹ Regular ethics training

Compliance & Audit

Level 4 - 85%
  • βœ“ Regulatory compliance
  • βœ“ Regular audits
  • βœ“ Automated controls

Technical Controls

Level 3 - 72%
  • βœ“ Model testing protocols
  • βœ“ Bias detection tools
  • β—‹ Explainability improvement

Data Governance

Level 3 - 78%
  • βœ“ Data quality processes
  • βœ“ Privacy controls
  • βœ“ Data lineage tracking

Monitoring & Reporting

Level 3 - 68%
  • βœ“ Performance dashboards
  • β—‹ Real-time alerts needed
  • β—‹ Stakeholder reporting

Overall Maturity Score

74%

Level 3: Defined

Your organization has documented AI governance processes and is working towards systematic measurement and optimization.

Recommendations for Level 4:

  • Establish formal AI Ethics Board with regular meetings
  • Implement automated risk monitoring and alerting systems
  • Develop quantitative metrics for AI governance effectiveness
  • Enhance stakeholder communication and reporting mechanisms
  • Integrate AI governance into enterprise risk management