Chapter 4: Satellite and Remote Sensing

WIA-ENE-051 | Greenhouse Gas Monitoring Standard v1.0

Monitoring greenhouse gases from space - the global perspective

4.1 Why Monitor GHGs from Space?

Satellite remote sensing revolutionized GHG monitoring by providing capabilities impossible from the ground:

Advantage Description Impact
Global Coverage Monitor entire planet, including oceans and remote areas No geographic blind spots
Consistency Single instrument, standardized methodology Comparable data across borders
Independence Objective data not controlled by individual nations Verify self-reported emissions
Systematic Sampling Regular revisit patterns Track temporal trends globally
Emission Detection Identify large point sources and plumes Find unreported emissions

Satellite vs. Ground Measurements: Complementary Strengths

Satellites excel at: Spatial coverage, source detection, regional budgets

Ground stations excel at: Precision, long-term trends, validation

Optimal approach: Combine both for comprehensive monitoring

4.2 Satellite Measurement Principles

Passive Remote Sensing

Most GHG satellites use passive spectrometers measuring reflected or emitted radiation:

How Passive Sensors Work

  1. Sunlight source: Sun illuminates Earth's surface
  2. Atmospheric path: Light passes through atmosphere (down and back up)
  3. Absorption: GHG molecules absorb specific wavelengths
  4. Reflection: Surface reflects remaining light
  5. Satellite detection: Spectrometer measures received spectrum
  6. Retrieval algorithm: Inverts spectrum to derive GHG concentration

Key concept: More absorption → less light reaching satellite → higher GHG concentration

Spectral Regions Used

Spectral Region Wavelength Gases Advantages Challenges
Near-Infrared (NIR) O₂ A-band ~0.76 μm O₂ Reference for surface pressure and light-path (cloud/aerosol) correction Requires sunlight
Shortwave IR (SWIR) 1.6-2.4 μm (CO₂ 1.61 and 2.06 μm, CH₄ 1.65 and 2.3 μm) CO₂, CH₄, CO, H₂O Strong absorption bands with sensitivity down to the surface Requires sunlight and surface reflection
Thermal IR (TIR) ~4-15 μm CO₂, CH₄, N₂O, O₃ Day/night operation, vertical profiles Reduced sensitivity near the surface

4.3 Major GHG Satellite Missions

🛰️ OCO-2 (Orbiting Carbon Observatory-2)

AgencyNASA (USA)
LaunchJuly 2, 2014
StatusOperational
OrbitSun-synchronous, 705 km altitude
Target GasCO₂
MeasurementColumn-averaged XCO₂
Spectral Bands0.765 μm (O₂ A-band), 1.61 μm, 2.06 μm (CO₂)
Footprint1.29 × 2.25 km
Precision Goal< 0.5 ppm XCO₂ (achieved: ~0.5-1 ppm)
Swath~10 km

Key Achievement: NASA's first dedicated CO₂ observing satellite, which opened the era of dense, high-precision XCO₂ observations. Its successor instrument, OCO-3, has performed urban observations (Snapshot Area Map mode) from the International Space Station (ISS) since 2019

Observing Modes:

🛰️ GOSAT (Greenhouse Gases Observing Satellite)

AgencyJAXA, National Institute for Environmental Studies (NIES), and Ministry of the Environment (Japan)
LaunchJanuary 23, 2009
Nickname"Ibuki" (breath)
StatusOperational
OrbitSun-synchronous, 666 km
Target GasesCO₂, CH₄
InstrumentTANSO-FTS (Fourier Transform Spectrometer)
Spectral Range0.76-14.3 μm (SWIR and TIR)
Footprint10.5 km diameter
Precision< 2 ppm XCO₂, < 10 ppb XCH₄

Historical Significance: First dedicated GHG monitoring satellite

Successors: GOSAT-2 launched in October 2018, and the Global Observing SATellite for Greenhouse gases and Water cycle (GOSAT-GW) launched in June 2025

🛰️ Sentinel-5P / TROPOMI

AgencyESA / EU Copernicus (Europe)
LaunchOctober 13, 2017
OrbitSun-synchronous, 824 km
Target GasesCH₄, NO₂, CO, O₃, SO₂, HCHO
InstrumentTROPOMI (TROPOspheric Monitoring Instrument)
Spectral Range270-2385 nm (UV-VIS-NIR-SWIR)
Resolution (CH₄, SWIR)7 × 7 km² (value in specification); 5.5 × 7 km² since August 2019
Swath2600 km
CoverageDaily global

Breakthrough: Unprecedented spatial resolution for methane detection

Impact: Used to detect large methane emission events worldwide from oil and gas facilities, coal mines, landfills, and other sources

🛰️ GHGSat Commercial Constellation

OperatorGHGSat Inc. (Canada)
First Launch2016 (GHGSat-D demo)
ConstellationCommercial constellation of multiple small satellites
Target GasCH₄ (primary), CO₂
Resolution~25 m (facility-scale)
ModelCommercial service (subscription-based)

Business Model: On-demand monitoring for oil & gas companies and regulators

Advantage: Ultra-high resolution enables facility-level attribution

4.4 Satellite Data Products

Column-Averaged Dry-Air Mole Fraction (XGas)

Understanding XCO₂ and XCH₄

Definition: Total column amount of gas divided by total column of dry air

XCO₂ = (Total CO₂ column) / (Total dry air column)

Units: ppm (parts per million)

Example:
  Total CO₂ column: 8.8 × 10²¹ molecules/cm²
  Dry air column: 2.12 × 10²⁵ molecules/cm²
  XCO₂ = (8.8 × 10²¹) / (2.12 × 10²⁵) × 10⁶ ≈ 415 ppm

Why use XCO₂ vs. surface concentration?

Processing Levels

Level Description Contents Users
L0 Raw data Instrument digital counts, engineering data Mission teams
L1B Calibrated radiances Geolocated, calibrated spectra Algorithm developers
L2 Geophysical retrievals XCO₂, XCH₄ with quality flags and errors Scientists, advanced users
L3 Gridded products Spatial/temporal averages, gap-filled General users, modelers
L4 Model outputs Flux inversions, forecasts Policy makers, public

4.5 Retrieval Algorithms

Converting measured spectra to GHG concentrations is complex and non-trivial:

Retrieval Process Overview

  1. Forward model: Simulate expected spectrum given atmosphere state
  2. Comparison: Compare simulation with actual measurement
  3. Iteration: Adjust atmospheric state to minimize difference
  4. Convergence: Repeat until best fit achieved
  5. Output: Retrieved GHG profile or column amount

Key challenges:

Major Retrieval Algorithms

Algorithm Mission Approach Key Features
ACOS OCO-2/3 Optimal estimation Full physics, aerosol scattering
RemoTeC TROPOMI Phillips-Tikhonov Fast processing, operational
FOCAL OCO-2 Fast iterative Independent retrieval to cross-validate ACOS results
NIES L2 GOSAT Optimal estimation (full physics) Operational algorithm of Japan's National Institute for Environmental Studies (NIES)

4.6 Plume Detection and Quantification

Satellites can now detect individual emission plumes from large sources:

Methane Plume Detection

Detection threshold (approximate): TROPOMI can detect CH₄ sources on the order of several tonnes per hour; high-resolution satellites such as GHGSat can detect sources on the order of several hundred kg per hour

Detection algorithm:

1. Calculate anomaly: ΔCH₄ = Observed - Background
2. Identify contiguous enhanced pixels
3. Apply statistical threshold (e.g., > 3σ)
4. Compute integrated mass enhancement (IME)
5. Estimate emission rate using wind speed

Emission rate (kg/hr) ≈ IME × U_eff / L
(U_eff = effective wind speed, L = plume length scale (square root of plume area))

Major sources detected:

Attribution to Facilities

Resolution Satellite Attribution Capability Typical Use Case
25 m GHGSat Individual facility Specific well pad, plant
~5-7 km TROPOMI Cluster of facilities Oil field, industrial zone
10 km GOSAT City or region Urban emissions, large basin

4.7 Validation and Uncertainty

Validation Hierarchy

How Satellites Are Validated

  1. Pre-launch: Laboratory calibration, algorithm testing on synthetic data
  2. Commissioning: Initial on-orbit performance verification
  3. Ground-based FTIR: TCCON provides primary validation (XGas)
  4. Aircraft campaigns: Vertical profiles for retrieval validation
  5. In-situ networks: Surface and tower data for flux inversions
  6. Inter-satellite comparison: Cross-validation between missions

Uncertainty Sources

Source Typical Magnitude Mitigation
Instrument noise ~0.5 ppm XCO₂ Averaging, better SNR
Aerosol scattering 0.5-2 ppm bias Simultaneous aerosol retrieval
Cloud contamination Variable bias Strict cloud screening
Surface reflectance 0.3-1 ppm Improved surface models
Spectroscopy ~0.2 ppm Laboratory measurements
Calibration drift 0.1-0.5 ppm/year On-board calibration, vicarious calibration

4.8 Inverse Modeling with Satellite Data

Satellite observations are used in inverse models to estimate surface fluxes:

Inverse Modeling Concept

Forward problem: Fluxes → Concentrations (atmospheric transport)

Inverse problem: Concentrations → Fluxes (infer sources/sinks)

Basic equation:

y = H × x + ε

where:
  y = observations (satellite XCO₂)
  x = state vector (fluxes at surface)
  H = observation operator (transport model)
  ε = observation error

Goal: Find x that best fits y

Solution approach (Bayesian):

x̂ = xb + BH^T(HBH^T + R)^-1(y - Hxb)

where:
  xb = prior fluxes (best guess)
  B = prior error covariance
  R = observation error covariance
  x̂ = optimized (posterior) fluxes

Applications of Flux Inversions

4.9 Future Satellite Missions

🛰️ CO2M (Copernicus CO₂ Monitoring)

AgencyESA / EU Copernicus / EUMETSAT (Europe)
Launch2027 or later (planned; delayed from 2025 in the specification's Phase 4 roadmap)
Mission TypeOperational constellation (multiple satellites)
OrbitSun-synchronous
GasesCO₂, CH₄, NO₂ (co-emitted tracer)
Resolution~2 × 2 km²
Precision Goal< 0.7 ppm XCO₂

Objective: Monitor fossil fuel CO₂ emissions from cities and power plants

Innovation: Aims to be an operational (not research) CO₂ monitoring system

🛰️ GeoCarb (Geostationary Carbon Observatory)

AgencyNASA (USA)
StatusCancelled by NASA in November 2022 (cost growth and schedule delays)
Planned OrbitGeostationary (over Americas)
Planned GasesCO₂, CH₄, CO, solar-induced fluorescence

Significance: Introduced the concept of observing the same region several times a day from geostationary orbit to track the diurnal evolution of emissions and biospheric fluxes

Relation to the Specification: The specification's Phase 4 roadmap plans GeoCarb integration in 2026, but because the mission was cancelled, this item must be replaced by another geostationary mission

🛰️ MicroCarb

AgencyCNES (France)
LaunchJuly 2025
GasCO₂
PlatformSmall satellite
Resolution4.5 × 9 km²

Innovation: Europe's first dedicated CO₂ observing satellite, demonstrating CO₂ monitoring with a small satellite

4.10 WIA-ENE-051 Satellite Data Integration

Standard Components for Satellite Data

Data ingestion API: The SDK call below is an example that wraps the specification's Phase 3 §8 REST endpoint GET /api/v1/ghg/concentration.

// Fetch satellite XCO2 data for region
const satelliteData = await wia.satellite.query({
  mission: 'OCO-2',
  gas: 'CO2',
  product: 'XCO2',
  level: 'L2',
  bbox: [lon_min, lat_min, lon_max, lat_max],
  date_range: ['2025-01-01', '2025-12-31'],
  quality_filter: 'good'
});

// Returns standardized GeoJSON with metadata
{
  type: 'FeatureCollection',
  mission: 'OCO-2',
  processing_version: 'v10r',
  features: [...]
}

Multi-mission fusion:

Quality assurance:

Key Takeaways

Review Questions

  1. What are the three main advantages of satellite GHG monitoring over ground stations?
  2. Explain how passive satellite spectrometers measure GHG concentrations.
  3. What does XCO₂ represent, and why is it used instead of surface concentration?
  4. Compare OCO-2 and TROPOMI in terms of target gases, resolution, and applications.
  5. What is the typical detection threshold for methane plumes with TROPOMI?
  6. Describe the satellite validation hierarchy. Why is TCCON critical?
  7. What is inverse modeling, and how does it use satellite observations?
  8. What breakthrough capability will CO2M provide compared to current missions?
  9. List three major sources of uncertainty in satellite GHG retrievals.
  10. How can geostationary GHG observation (e.g., the cancelled GeoCarb concept) complement polar-orbiting observations?